Smith was charged and convicted of killing five people during an armed robbery in louisiana. Reply brief the brief in opposition offers no meaningful response to the reasons why it is important for the court to decide the question presented by this case, either in bms or by granting this petition. The fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution provides in relevant part. Listing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Smith s representation that the appellants reply brief is anticipated to be filed by june 15, 2016, counsels request for an extension of time in which to file that brief. Before smith, barksdale, and higginson, circuit judges. The states reply included the initial police report as an attachment. Brady held that due process bars a state from withholding evidence that is favorable to the defense and 181 l. Appellants filing one notice of appeal must file a single brief unless permission is granted for separate briefs. City of north wildwood and state of new jersey matter no cmpl0041516 dear judge mendez, please accept this letter brief in reply to plaintiffs opposition to the states motion to dismiss in lieu of a more formal brief in the abovereferenced matter. Houston criminal lawyer john floyd and paralegal billy sinclair for reasons we discussed in a previous post, the u.
Salish kootenai college, a montana corporation, and the court of appeals of the confederated salish and kootenai tribes of the flathead reservation, respondents. Office of the solicitor brief bank us department of labor. Smith contends that the louisiana state courts reached this result only by disregarding established precedents regarding the suppression of material evidence favorable to a defendant and presentation of false or misleading evidence to a prosecutor in past supreme court cases, brady v. Of murder if it found 1 possession of stolen property and 2 slight. In the supreme court of the united states g eorge g eorgiou, petitioner v. List of united states supreme court cases involving. Such cases have come to comprise a substantial portion of the supreme courts docket. State of louisiana, respondent brief in opposition to writ of certiorari office of the district attorney 26th judicial district state of louisiana j. Brief of the innocence network as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. Halcombs brief and additionally asserts the following as contained in this reply. Cain did not break new legal ground but instead served to correct a past injustice.
This court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal by the state. Roberts, jr i have the opinion of the court this morning in case 108145, juan smith versus burl cain. The oral argument before the supreme court was today and apparently it did not go well for the office of the prosecutor. The 1 although petitioner was subsequently brought to trial. Tammany parish with one count of possession of cocaine. Findley president innocence network university of wisconsin. Before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendants, james leblanc, secretary of the department of corrections, darryl vannoy, warden at the louisiana state penitentiary, leslie dupont, deputy warden of the louisiana state penitentiary, james cruze, assistant warden at. It is ordered that the 4 petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by terry glenn smith be deemed successive and transferred to the united states fifth circuit court of appeals pursuant to 28 usc section 1631 for further proceedings as provided by 28 usc section. Smith order 08232019 a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is. Smith contends that the louisiana state courts reached this result only by disregarding established precedents. But smith offers no support for his dubious assertion that detective adams would have admitted to framing smith, or that, had the detective denied the allegation, the jury would have believed rogersa convicted murderer who never explained any motive adams would have had to frame smith over the detective. First, dep reiterates that plaintiffs lacks standing to. Cain, warden certiorari to the criminal district court of louisiana, orleans parish no.
High court misses opportunity to discuss ethical obligations of prosecutors by. Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liber ty, or property, without due process of law. Argued november 8, 2011decided january 10, 2012 petitioner juan smith was convicted of firstdegree murder based on the testimony of a single eyewitness. A summary of the abas argument is outlined in its amicus curiae brief. Utah court briefs administrators only brigham young. Second, smith asserts that disclosure of rogers interview would have led the defense and the jury to learn of rogers allegationmade for the first time 10 years after smith s trialthat the police had asked him to implicate juan smith as short dog, tr. Supreme court of the united states syllabus smith v. A few days ago i posted a note about a new case before the supreme court on prosecutorial misconduct in new orleans called smith v. The prosectors failure to tender evidence to the defense did not deprive respondent of a fair trial. But smith offers no support for his dubious assertion that detective adams would have admitted to framing smith, or that, had the detective denied. Cain to discuss the ethical discovery obligations of both federal and state prosecutorsan idea strongly suggested by the american bar association in. As of february 8, 2008 all opinions are adobe acrobat pdf documents. Cain audio transcription for opinion announcement january 10, 2012 in smith v.
On the deep divisions in the lower courts, respondents. Cain1emphasizes the importance of prosecutorial conformity to the requirements of due process ensured under the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the united states. We are providing significant briefs filed by the office of the solicitor and, in some cases, filed by the solicitor. The state now submits this reply brief to address the new material contained in smith s brief.
An elderly woman was shot in her temple after doing some food shopping at a schwegmann. In sum, in its opening brief and at oral argument, the state maintained. After a jury trial, petitioner was convicted in louisi ana state court on five counts of firstdegree murder. Cain, is being asked by juan smith s attorneys and the american bar association aba to address a prosecutors pretrial ethical obligations to disclose exculpatory evidence. On petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit petitioners repl y brief lon j.
Eight volumes of record received from the supreme court of louisiana. The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without. Opinion of the court police investigation of his case, including. Court of appeals this disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by ninth circuit rule 363. Brief for the national association of criminal defense lawyers brief for the american bar association. Filing 9 judgment adopting 8 report and recommendations. Love, iv, counsel for petitioners do hereby certify that true and exact copies of the foregoing. On january 10, 2012, the supreme court announced its decision in smith v. Audio transcription for oral argument november 08, 2011 in smith v. The united states constitution contains several provisions regarding criminal procedure, including. Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. Smith, circuit judges, and erickson, district judge. Appellants file one reply brief regardless of the number of appellee briefs.
Juan smith was convicted of murdering five people during an armed robbery. Smith, is a convicted inmate currently incarcerated in the louisiana state penitentiary in angola, louisiana. File briefs in pdf, preferably searchable native pdf. The court holds that juan smith is entitled to a new murder trial because the state, in violation of brady v.
Andrieu counsel of record chief of appeals graymond f. Juan smith was convicted on five counts of murder and sentenced to life in prison without parole. Smith argued that the prosecutions failure to disclose those statements violated brady v. On writ of certiorari to the orleans parish criminal district court of louisiana january 10, 2012 j ustice t homas, dissenting. Article three, along with amendments five, six, eight, and fourteen. Frap 25a5 and rules cited therein provide guidance. At trial, the jury heard the testimony of a single witness, larry boatner.
1483 1495 1217 913 338 1031 1283 371 1233 1560 38 1055 662 41 103 822 312 483 185 579 75 1375 207 869 906 846 468 423 467 1408